Legal Opinion

H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Pais

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 1, 1997No. 04-96-00846-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHIRLEY W. BUTTS, Justice

(Retired).

H.E. Butt Grocery Company (H.E.B.) appeals from a judgment in favor of Armando and Rose Marie Pais (Pais), plaintiffs below, contending that the trial court erred in vacating the judgment in its favor based on the jury’s verdict and rendering a “reformed” judgment in favor of Pais.

H.E.B. advances five points of error: that the trial court erred in vacating the judgment and rendering judgment for Pais because H.E.B. is entitled to a take nothing judgment; that the reformed judgment is error because, as a matter of law, the trial court had no authority…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Escobar v. EscobarTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Andrews v. KochTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fort Bend Central Appraisal District v. Hines Wholesale NurseriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Caylat v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Seminole Pipeline Co., MAPCO, Inc. v. Broad Leaf Partners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. State v. Dudley, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  3. Benefit Planners, L.L.P. v. RenCare, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. In the Interest of M.M.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Jang Won Cho v. Kun Sik Kim and Veronica Young Lee, Legal Heir to Patrick Hiy Chang Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API