Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Hill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1887No. 2270PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Fayette. Tried below before the Hon. H. Teichmueller.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was brought by the appellee to restrain the enforcement of a judgment rendered *386against him in a justice’s court in favor of the appellant. He sought relief on the ground that the judgment was obtained by fraud, and upon the further ground that the judgment was dormant. An execution had issued on the judgment, for the first time, more than a year after the judgment was rendered, and under it a bale of cotton had been seized, which by consent of parties was sold and the proceeds were in the hands of the sheriff. The defendant denied that the judgment was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stein v. Frieberg, Klein & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Willis v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Watson v. NewshamTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Hale v. McComasTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. North v. SwingTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Patton v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Austin v. ConawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Warren v. KohrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Shannon v. HayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API