Legal Opinion

Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 2007No. 1 CA-TX 06-0005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment finding Ormond Builders, Inc. (“Ormond”) liable for transaction privilege tax under the State prime contracting classification and a municipal construction contracting classification. The judgment held Ormond liable for $477,785.25 with interest due to the State, Navajo County, and Gila County and $107,967.53 with interest due to the City of Show Low. We find that Ormond was a taxable prime contractor but that its gross income derived from the business of prime contracting did not include the amounts it received to pay other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ebasco Services Inc. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Walden Books Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rigel Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Central Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. City of Peoria v. Brink's Home Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. In Re Guardianship of PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API