Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment finding Ormond Builders, Inc. (“Ormond”) liable for transaction privilege tax under the State prime contracting classification and a municipal construction contracting classification. The judgment held Ormond liable for $477,785.25 with interest due to the State, Navajo County, and Gila County and $107,967.53 with interest due to the City of Show Low. We find that Ormond was a taxable prime contractor but that its gross income derived from the business of prime contracting did not include the amounts it received to pay other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Ebasco Services Inc. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Walden Books Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rigel Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. Central Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- City of Peoria v. Brink's Home Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In Re Guardianship of PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.