Legal Opinion

Rigel Corp. v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 22, 2010No. 1 CA-TX 08-0006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Rigel Corporation, doing business as Krispy Kreme (“Rigel”), appeals an Arizona Tax Court ruling holding Rigel liable for transaction privilege taxes under the retail classification. See Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 42-5061(A) (Supp.2009). 1 The issue presented is whether Rigel is a qualified retailer, exempt from the transaction privilege tax, under one or more of the enumerated exceptions in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 42-5102(A) (2006). The tax court concluded that Rigel did not come within any of these exceptions to taxation, and we agree.

¶ 2 Additionally,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tower Plaza Investments, Limited v. DeWittArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Estate of Nelson v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Aland v. MeadWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Arizona ex rel. Goddard v. Frito-Lay, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  4. 100 Val Vista/Montgomery LLC v. Pinal Cnty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. Mikel Lo, M.D. and Mikel W. Lo, M.d, Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API