Legal Opinion
Bryant v. Armstrong
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 14, 2012No. Civil No. 08cv02318 W(RBB)PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS [ECF NOS. 53, 56, 66, 71, 74, 82, 86]
RUBEN B. BROOKS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On December 12, 2008, Plaintiff Stanford Paul Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [ECF No. 1]. Bryant filed a First Amended Complaint on March 3, 2009 [ECF No. 3], and a Second Amended Complaint on June 23, 2010 [ECF No. 39].
Following several motions to dismiss, Defendants Armstrong, Catlett, Janda, Lizarra-ga, Ochoa, and Trujillo filed an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on April 29, 2011 [ECF…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Heilman v. WaldronDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Terrell v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Terrell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- (PC) Gosztyla v. GruenwaldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Gosztyla v. JenkinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Lear v. SahotaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.