Legal Opinion

Conner v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 6, 2003No. 01-5679PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Jim Conner and Ken L. Maples (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) brought an action to recover damages from a failed franchise opportunity with Defendant Hardee’s Food Systems, Inc. (“Hardee’s”). Plaintiffs sued Hardee’s for various state law claims. The district court granted summary judgment to Hardee’s on all counts and dismissed Plaintiffs’ case in its entirety. On appeal, Plaintiffs argue that the district court improperly granted summary judgment since the facts establish the existence of an express or implied contract, intentional or negligent misrepresentations,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bush v. Dictaphone Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Shahrdar v. Global Housing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Anglers of the Au Sable v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Wright v. Linebarger Googan Blair & Sampson, LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
  3. Strayhorn v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
  4. Conway v. LicataDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  5. Strayhorn v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API