Legal Opinion
Wright v. Linebarger Googan Blair & Sampson, LLP
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 22, 2011No. 10-2304PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff Darrell L. Wright, Sr. (“Plaintiff’), administrator of the Estate of Lenora S. Wright (“Estate”), in his representative capacity and on behalf of all others similarly situated, alleges that Defendant Linebarger Googan Blair & Sampson, LLP (“Linebarger”) violated Tennessee law by charging unlawfully high attorney’s fees for collecting delinquent property taxes owed to the City of Memphis (the “City”). (First Am. Compl. ¶ 9, ECF No. 5.) Five motions are now before the Court.
On May 14, 2010, Linebarger filed a motion to stay the case…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Timothy Pagliara v. Johnston Barton Proctor and RoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Plate v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
- Axis Dynamics v. Knox County TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Botts v. The Johns Hopkins UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Boyd v. MartinezDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.