Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Kasser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1984No. 539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from a final decree adjudicating the boundary between appellants’ property and appellees’ property. We affirm.

The parties’ arguments concern not the chancellor’s findings of fact, which are not challenged, but the conclusions to be drawn from those findings. The findings, and the testimony from which they derive, may be summarized as follows.

Appellants, Joseph and Frida Friedman, owned jointly with Leonard and Bernice Feldman a large tract of land known as part of Kings Oak Estate in Abington Township, Montgomery County. The tract was subdivided into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Berger v. Pittsburgh Auto Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Apex Financial Corp. v. DeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Murphy v. Beverly Hills Realty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Joyner v. Harleysville InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BlankenbillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Stallo v. Ins. Placement Facility of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Blouch v. Clifford R. Zinn & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API