Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Beverly Hills Realty Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1929No. Appeal 216PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff in answer to an advertisement in a newspaper for land salesmen called at the Harris Building in Philadelphia, where he was employed to sell lots located at Beverly Hills on a commission of five per cent. He continued this work for a period of two years, during which time he made seven sales. He received commissions on five of these sales; on the other two transactions commissions were not paid. Plaintiff brought this suit alleging that his contract of employment was with the defendant corporation. The defendant denied being a party to any contract with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Wachter v. Phœnix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Williams v. GettySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Winter v. Iron City Stamping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Apex Financial Corp. v. DeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Myers v. Garfield & Johnson Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Friedman v. KasserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Nusbaum v. Warwick Hotel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API