Murphy v. Beverly Hills Realty Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff in answer to an advertisement in a newspaper for land salesmen called at the Harris Building in Philadelphia, where he was employed to sell lots located at Beverly Hills on a commission of five per cent. He continued this work for a period of two years, during which time he made seven sales. He received commissions on five of these sales; on the other two transactions commissions were not paid. Plaintiff brought this suit alleging that his contract of employment was with the defendant corporation. The defendant denied being a party to any contract with the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Wachter v. Phœnix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Williams v. GettySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Winter v. Iron City Stamping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by15 opinions
- Apex Financial Corp. v. DeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Myers v. Garfield & Johnson Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Friedman v. KasserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Nusbaum v. Warwick Hotel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.