Legal Opinion

Schoney v. Memorial Estates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 6, 1990No. 880630-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BILLINGS, GARFF and ORME, JJ. ORME, Judge:

Plaintiffs, the Schoneys, 1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendant Memorial Estates. The judgment was based on two independent grounds: 1) Summary judgment on the merits and 2) default judgment for failure to respond timely to a discovery request. We affirm as to the default judgment and accordingly have no need to consider the propriety of the summary judgment.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case involves a long-standing dispute over a contract for mausoleum space and other “pre-need” funeral arrangements. The procedural…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. W. W. & W. B. Gardner, Inc. v. Park West Village, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Maxfield v. RushtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Utah Department of Transportation v. OsguthorpeUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Darrington v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. PC Crane Service, LLC v. McQueen Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Preston & Chambers, P.C. v. KollerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API