Legal Opinion

Preston & Chambers, P.C. v. Koller

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 31, 1997No. 960590-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINS, Associate Presiding Judge:

Having had his claim certified under Rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Evan 0. Koller appeals the trial court’s order granting plaintiff Preston & Chamber’s (Preston) motion for partial summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice Koller’s legal malpractice counterclaims. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

At the hearing on Preston’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court determined that an expert witness was required to establish the attorney standard of care and imposed a deadline for Koller to designate such an expert. The trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Milne v. USA Cycling Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Posner v. Equity Title Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  3. PC Crane Service, LLC v. McQueen Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Hales v. OldroydCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  5. Tuck v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API