Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Rushton

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 23, 1989No. 880332-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARFF, Judge:

Plaintiff and appellant, Reed Maxfield, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his action against defendants and respondents, Owen A. and Carol Rushton, and the State of Utah, for failure to prosecute. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of his action.

We recite only those facts pertinent to disposition of this appeal.

Maxfield initially filed his complaint in this action on October 20, 1980, alleging that the Rushtons had wrongfully deprived him of his property by purchasing it through an illegal sheriff’s sale. The Rushtons filed their answer and counterclaim on April 1, 1981,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. Leisure Sports Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Maxfield v. FishlerUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brasher Motor and Finance Company v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hartford Leasing Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc. v. Utah State University Department of Agriculture & Applied ScienceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Schoney v. Memorial Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Rohan v. BosemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Cheek v. Clay Bulloch Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API