Integrated Container Service, Inc. v. Starlines Container Shipping, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
Defendants Starlines Container Shipping, Ltd. (“Starlines Container”) and Starlines Shipping Co., Inc. (“Starlines Shipping”) and garnishees Kane, Halley & Chalos, move pursuant to Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (the “Supplemental Rules”) to vacate a writ of maritime attachment on the grounds that defendants are “found within the district” within the meaning of Supplemental Rule B(l) and that the claim is not a maritime or admiralty claim. The defendants move also to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State of NY v. Cortelle Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Seawind Compania, S. A. v. Crescent Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Chilean Line Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, and Main Ship Repair Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Cia. Naviera Continental S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Cti-Container Leasing Corporation v. Oceanic Operations CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Florens Container v. Cho Yang ShippingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Foss Launch & Tug Co. v. Char Ching Shipping U.S.A., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.