Legal Opinion
Florens Container v. Cho Yang Shipping
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 4, 2002No. C 01-2226PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO TRANSFER
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Inchcape Shipping Services, Inc., (Inchcape) moves this Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 41(b), to dismiss the present action. Alternatively, Inchcape seeks to transfer the current action to the Northern District of Ohio, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Defendant Cho Yang Shipping Co., Ltd., (CYS) (collectively “Defendants”) joins in support of both motions.
Defendants’ Rule 41(b) motion requires the Court to determine whether this action should be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Pacific Car and Foundry Company v. Honorable Martin Pence, United States District Judge, District of Hawaii, and L. C. O'Neil Trucks Pty. LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. Your Store Online, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Amini Innovation Corp. v. JS IMPORTS INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Lax v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Byler v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Alec L. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.