Seawind Compania, S. A. v. Crescent Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.
Seawind Compañía, S. A., appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Bonsai, J., sitting in the admiralty, by which the attachment of credits and effects of respondent-appellee, Crescent Lines, Inc., now known as Falcon Shipping Corp., was vacated. The attachment had been made pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules of Practice in Admiralty and Maritime Cases promulgated by the United States Supreme Court. We affirm the order below.1
By its libel filed March 20, 1962, Sea-wind sought recovery of damages from Crescent Line and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Transfield ER Cape Ltd. v. Industrial Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Integrated Container Service, Inc. v. Starlines Container Shipping, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- STX Panocean (UK) Co. v. Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.