Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos Saro, United States of America v. Cornelio Cabrera-Baez
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 23, 1994No. 91-3208, 91-3225PublishedCited by 196 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Carlos Saro and Cornelio Cabrera-Baez raise a variety of challenges to their convictions for various drug offenses. Except for the attacks on their sentences, all are insubstantial. Because of apparent error in the calculation of Cabrera-Baez’s “base offense level”, we remand his case for further consideration. We affirm Saro’s conviction in all respects.
In their joint trial, Saro and Cabrera-Baez faced three charges common to both; Saro also was charged with four additional counts by himself.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by196 opinions
- United States v. Kevin Williams-DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.