Legal Opinion

Pannulla v. Rosenberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, 33PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Petitioner was arrested on a charge of pool selling and bookmaking on horse races. Police officers seized and confiscated $600 found in his bureau drawer. He petitioned the court below for an order directing Samuel Rosenberg, Director of Public Safety, and John Murphy, Inspector of the Vice Squad, to return the money to him. After taking the testimony the petition was refused.

The proceeding is in rem and the Commonwealth is not held to the same degree of proof required in a criminal trial. Denial of appellant’s petition must be affirmed if from the testimony the trial judge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Superintendent of Police Le StrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Fairmount Engine Co. v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Urban's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Schuettler v. MaurerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. BlytheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Nu-Ken Novelty, Inc. v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. McDermondCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Pratico v. RhodesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API