Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blythe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, 246PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Frederick H. Blythe was the owner and Joseph Runo was the operator of a public Bingo game conducted on a large scale in an amusement park in Somerset County, known as Ideal Park. In the operation of the game patrons purchased Bingo cards from any one of five attendants and the stakes played for were “prizes” of various types of merchandise. It is conceded as it must be that the Bingo game as conducted was an unlawful gambling operation. The essential elements were present: a prize was to be won; the winner was determined by chance, and a consideration was paid by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Superintendent of Police Le StrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Fairmount Engine Co. v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Company's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Mills Novelty Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Schuettler v. MaurerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BretzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. State v. FossettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. United States v. KohneDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API