Legal Opinion

Urban's Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1941No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion, by

Cunningham, J.,

Frank Urban, appellant herein, is the owner .of several “pinball” machines and a member and representative of the Amusement Machines Association of Philadelphia. The association owns and had placed -in divers cigar and drug stores, luncheonettes, taprooms and other public plácés in the City of.'Philadelphia^ several hundred machines, under an arrangement with the proprietors of the stores, etc., for a division, of the coins deposited therein by the persons desirous of playing ■them. He now appeals,' for himself and-on behalf of the association, from an order of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Company's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Mills Novelty Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. In Re Petition of Supt. of PoliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth v. MihalowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. American Legion Post No. 51 AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API