Legal Opinion

Strickler Co. v. Eisner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1935No. Civ. 9316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover installments of rent, also taxes and attorneys’ fees, alleged to be due under the terms of a written lease. The appeal is presented upon the judgment roll alone, and the evidence is not before us. The contention of the appelknt is that it affirmatively appears on the face of the findings that the obligations upon which the suit was brought were secured by a mortgage and that plaintiff is not entitled to obtain a money judgment against the appelknt unless it forecloses said mortgage in accordance with section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Indianapolis Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. May Stores, Inc. v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Valensin v. ValensinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sigler v. GondonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Washburn v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Teichner v. KlassmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Lederer v. MuirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API