Valensin v. Valensin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
Action for a divorce on the ground of cruelty, which consisted in a course of treatment on the part of defendant, causing grievous bodily suffering and grievous mental anguish.
On the trial, Dr. Simmons was called as a witness for plaintiff. He stated that he had attended both plaintiff and defendant professionally. He was asked as to the condition of plaintiff’s health. Witness declined to answer, unless he was assured by the court he would not be cross-examined, averring that he might be required to state, on such cross-examination, matters which had been confided to him professionally.
Plaint…
2Cited by10 opinions
- MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Slaughter v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Allen v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Stitt v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Crago v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.