May Stores, Inc. v. Bishop
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
It will be observed from the foregoing statement of facts that the rent for which plaintiff seeks judgment was payable under a written lease which stipulated for a gross sum of $4,800, pay able in monthly instalments. From Clark on Code Pleading, p. 327, we quote: 44 On instalment contracts a like rule applies, namely that successive suits may be brought as each instalment falls due, but all instalments due at the time suit is brought must be claimed or are waived. The rule has been applied to various forms of such contract, including rent under a lease. * * * ” To same effect see 1 R. C. L.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jordan v. Indianapolis Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Knapp v. Order of PendoWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Sigler v. GondonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Pickerill v. Home Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. BaumanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1943
- Suetter v. A. E. Kern & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Pullan Ex Rel. Pullan v. SteinmetzUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Strickler Co. v. EisnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.