Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 2, 2006No. 05-751CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion by the defendant, the United States (“government” or “United States”), to dismiss the equitable subrogation claim of the plaintiff, *545Cincinnati Insurance Company (“plaintiff’ or “CIC”), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), or, in the alternative, the government seeks summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56. The government contends that the plaintiff, a Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 3131-3134 (2000 & Supp. 2002), surety of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National American Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API