Legal Opinion

Santos v. Figueroa

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 9, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 N.J. Super. 227 (1965)

208 A.2d 810

RAMIRO SANTOS (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

ANSELMO FIGUEROA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 23, 1965.

Decided April 9, 1965.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.

Mr. Nicholas H. Politan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Krieger & Chodash, attorneys).

No appearance by defendant-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, 20 in number, sued defendant for the fraudulent conversion of the sum of $17,460 entrusted by them to him. They had him served…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Eldridge v. . Endicott, Johnson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Wangler v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Gosschalk v. GosschalkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Gosschalk v. GosschalkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Klaiber v. FrankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum Inst. Manage. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Marxe v. MarxeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Poss v. District Court in and for El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API