Legal Opinion
Yuhasz v. Brush Wellman, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 14, 2001No. 3:00CV7237PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Relator Richard M. Yuhasz brings this action against defendants Brush Wellman, Inc. (“Brush”) and James Feldhouse claiming Brush violated the False Claims Act and wrongfully terminated plaintiff. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367 and 31 U.S.C. §§ 3732(a) and 3730(h). Pending is Brush’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). For the following reasons, Brush’s motion shall be granted.
BACKGROUND
By itself or through intermediaries, defendant Brush supplies “super” alloys, spi-nodal alloys, and other alloys to the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard M. Yuhasz v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Boroff v. Alza Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- US EX REL. SCHUHARDT v. Washington UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- Davis v. Marriott Intl IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005