Legal Opinion

CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND v. McCORMICK DRAY LINE, INC.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 12, 1996No. 95-1740PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

85 F.3d 1098

64 USLW 2810, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1321,

Pens. Plan Guide P 23920Q

CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND; Central

Pennsylvania Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund;

Joseph J. Samolewicz

v.

McCORMICK DRAY LINE, INC.; James Webb.

Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund and

Joseph J. Samolewicz, Appellants.

No. 95-1740.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued March 13, 1996.

Decided June 12, 1996.

Frank C. Sabatino (argued) Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellants.

Craig S. Hudson (argued) Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3578 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3579 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00370)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit and Educational Funds v. Andrew LutykCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API