Legal Opinion
Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 3, 2006No. 2006-1088PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG (“DyStar”) sued defendants C.H. Patrick Co. and Bann Química Ltda. (collectively, “Bann”) in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, alleging direct, contributory, and induced infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,586,992 (“the '992 patent”),1 which discloses a process for dyeing textile materials with catalytically hydrogenated leuco indigo. DyStar and Bann Química Ltda. are large chemical manufacturers *1358that, inter alia, sell prereduced indigo for use in dyeing processes; C.H. Patrick Co. purchased…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Pharmasterm Therapeutics, Inc. v. Viacell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Wyers v. Master Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.