Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bubna

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2007No. 2007-1115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Walter Peter Bubna of Parma, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0017928, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1980.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for one year, staying the last six months on conditions, based on findings that he (1) commingled his and clients’ funds in the same bank account, (2) failed to keep records of client funds in the account, and (3) sometimes overdrew the account, preventing him from paying sums to which a client was entitled. On review, we agree that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Gold.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Pigott.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. StreeterOhio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API