Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pigott.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2018No. 2018-0815PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*613 {¶ 1} Respondent, Thomas Daniel Pigott, of Toledo, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0062919, was admitted to the *1271 practice of law in Ohio in 1994. We suspended Pigott's license to practice law for four days in December 2005 for his failure to register as an attorney for the 2005-2007 biennium. In re Attorney Registration Suspension of Pigott , 107 Ohio St.3d 1431 , 2005-Ohio-6408 , 838 N.E.2d 671 ; In re Reinstatement of Pigott , 107 Ohio St.3d 1705 , 2006-Ohio-13 , 840 N.E.2d 209 .

{¶ 2} In an October 27, 2017 complaint, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Pigott with multiple acts of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Association v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BubnaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ManningOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. PigottOhio Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API