Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2003No. 2003-1117PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Stanford Smith of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0030754, was admitted to the practice of law in 1958. On December 9, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent in a two-count complaint with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent was served with the complaint but did not answer, and relator moved for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F). A master commissioner appointed by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause and made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation.

{¶ 2} As to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. KelloggOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoppelOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API