Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. France

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2002No. 2002-1130PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We are asked in this case to determine the sanction for an attorney who seriously neglected two clients’ cases and then, despite having been disciplined recently for other serious misconduct, repeatedly ignored efforts to investigate the neglect. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, John S. France of Toledo, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0014846, committed these acts and thereby violated DR 1-102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 6-101(A)(l) (handling a legal matter that a lawyer is incompetent to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. MousheyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API