Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 22, 2004No. SC02-111PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

866 So.2d 41 (2004)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Jeanette Elizabeth SMITH, Respondent.

No. SC02-111.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 22, 2004.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, FL; and Carlos Alberto Leon, Bar Counsel, Miami, FL, for Complainant.

Richard B. Marx of Richard B. Marx & Associates, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Jeanette Elizabeth Smith. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar filed a three-count disciplinary complaint…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. The Florida Bar v. FredericksSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. The Florida Bar v. Jeremy W. AltersSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. The Florida Bar v. Del PinoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. The Florida Bar v. RiggsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Florida Bar v. HeadSupreme Court of Florida · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API