Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Head

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 15, 2012No. SC10-1175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Koko Head be found guilty of professional misconduct and sanctioned by an admonishment with probation. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee’s recommendations as to guilt and award of costs. For the reasons discussed herein, we find that Respondent acted deliberately or knowingly and therefore disapprove the referee’s finding that Respondent acted negligently. We disapprove the referee’s finding that Respondent’s misconduct constitutes minor misconduct. We also disapprove the referee’s recommended…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Peter M. MacNamaraSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. The Florida Bar v. Danielle Renee WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2025
  3. The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen SchwartzSupreme Court of Florida · 2022
  4. The Florida Bar v. Peter M. MacNamaraSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  5. The Florida Bar v. Peter M. MacNamaraSupreme Court of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API