Legal Opinion

Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Ianni

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2006No. 04-0666PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

In general, an employer owes no duty to protect the public from the wrongful acts of its off-duty employees that are committed off the work site unless the employer exercises control over the employees’ off-duty activities that cause harm. See Otis Eng’g Corp. v. Clark, 668 S.W.2d 307, 309, 311 (Tex.1983). Here, we are asked to decide whether an employer owes a duty to protect the public from an employee’s wrongful off-duty conduct, even though the employer exercised no control over the employee’s off-duty activities, because the employer knew its employee was drug-impaired and had threatened…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Graff v. BeardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Colonial Savings Ass'n v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. EscotoTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Dearing, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. Chrismon v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API