Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Ianni
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
In general, an employer owes no duty to protect the public from the wrongful acts of its off-duty employees that are committed off the work site unless the employer exercises control over the employees’ off-duty activities that cause harm. See Otis Eng’g Corp. v. Clark, 668 S.W.2d 307, 309, 311 (Tex.1983). Here, we are asked to decide whether an employer owes a duty to protect the public from an employee’s wrongful off-duty conduct, even though the employer exercised no control over the employee’s off-duty activities, because the employer knew its employee was drug-impaired and had threatened…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Graff v. BeardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Colonial Savings Ass'n v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. EscotoTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Dearing, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Chrismon v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.