Legal Opinion

Snowden v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 22, 1984No. 144, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

Carl 0. Snowden, “for himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated,” commenced the present action by filing in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County a declaration against the Baltimore Gas & Electric Company. Snowden alleged in the declaration that he had telephoned the defendant to make a complaint concerning his bill, that during his telephone conversation with the defendant’s Customer Service Representative he heard a “beep,” and that he “was advised that it was the policy of the company to record all incoming calls relative to inquiries concerning service or…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Yarema v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Wilde v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Planning Board v. MortimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Walbert v. WalbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API