Legal Opinion
Lockwood v. Hercules Powder Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1949No. 13800PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in the District Court from two orders. The first was an order dated February 16, 1948, sustaining in part defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in part and to make the complaint more definite and certain. The second order dated May 12, 1948, overruled plaintiff’s motion for a rehearing and to set aside the order of February 16, 1948. No answer has been filed by the defendant and no judgment has been entered or requested.
No motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed, but counsel for appellee suggest in their brief that the orders…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Battaglia v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Western Contracting Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Petrol Corporation v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Winsor v. DaumitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Moorhead Construction Co., Inc., a Corporation, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Grand Forks, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.