Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Precision Apparatus, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
This is an application by plaintiff for a preliminary injunction restraining defendants(a) from merging Pacotronics Inc. and Transvision Electronics Incorporated into Precision Apparatus, Inc., and(b) from utilizing assets of Trans-vision to pay indebtedness of Pacotronics.
The action is for a permanent injunction against the same acts, for judgment rendering “the fraudulent merger null and void” and returning “the parties to their status quo”, and for an accounting. Although not alleged in the complaint, it is assumed that plaintiff claims an interest in this matter as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Flagg-Utica Corp. v. BaseliceNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Williams v. BartellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Katz v. R. Hoe & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goldfield Corp. v. General Host Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Rosenfeld v. Schwitzer CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Badger v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Dean v. Protho Express, Inc. (In Re Protho Express, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1991