Legal Opinion
Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1946PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThaoher, J.
We are concerned in this case with the merger and consolidation of International Agricultural Corporation, a New York corporation, and Union Potash & Chemical Company, a Colorado corporation. These companies were consolidated pursuant to section 91 of article 8 of the New York Stock Corporation Law, and the defendant, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, organized under the laws of the State of New York, is the consolidated or continuing company resulting from the merger of the two constituent companies.
The plaintiff, William C. Anderson, owner and holder of 500 shares of 7% prior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Godley v. . Crandall Godley Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Davison v. Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of SilberkrausNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Colby v. . Equitable Trust Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Alpert v. 28 Williams Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Gabhart v. GabhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Garzo v. Maid of the Mist Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Phelps v. Watson-Stillman CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.