Legal Opinion

Badger v. Madsen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 11, 1995No. 940254-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Associate Presiding Judge:

Plaintiffs Wesley Badger, Grant LeFevre, Albert LeFevre, Ray M. Greenwood, Thomas LeFevre, and Clay C. Paxton (collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Myron Madsen, Glade Winget, Brent Lundgreen, and Brooklyn Canal Company (Brooklyn). We affirm.

I. FACTS

When reviewing a trial court’s grant of summary judgment, the facts and all reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. K & T, Inc. v. Koroulis, 888 P.2d 623, 624…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Camp v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bonds v. Third District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Levanger v. VincentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  4. James Benthin v. Washoe County School District; Does I through XX; and Roe Corporations I through XXDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API