Schooler v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
Louis V. Schooler appeals a judgment after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the State of California (the State) on his suit for injunction to abate a nuisance, costs of efforts to abate the nuisance and general damages arising from loss of use and the diminished value of his property caused by erosion of a state-owned adjacent bluff. He contends the court erred in finding the unimproved bluff adjacent to a public beach is a natural condition as a matter of law for purposes of the immunity designated in Government Code 1 section 831.25. He also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Reliance National Indemnity Co. v. General Star Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Branco v. Kearny Moto Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Chao Chen YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Esparza v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In Re Estate of MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cnty. of San Mateo v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.