Legal Opinion
Meza v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 1, 2015No. Case No. 14-CV-03486-LHKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 41, 59, 64, 66, 69
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Julia Meza brings this putative class action case for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ECF No. 16. Defendants Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”); Hunt & Henriques (“H & H”); Michael Scott Hunt; Janalie Ann Henriques; and Anthony J. Dipiero (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 41. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds oral argument…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Christine Wade, F/k/a Christine Snow v. Regional Credit Association, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ciganek v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Meza v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019