Legal Opinion

Ciganek v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 7, 2016No. Case No. 15-CV-03837-LHKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiff William Ciganek, Jr., brings this putative class action case for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ECF No. 1. Defendants Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”); Hunt & Henriques (“H&H”); Michael Scott Hunt; and Janalie Ann Henriques (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 42 (“Mot.”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds oral argument unnecessary to the resolution of this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
James A. Swanson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.