Livingston v. Marie Callenders, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
The question in this case is whether a restaurant offering vegetable soup “made ¿rom the freshest ingredients, from scratch, . . . every day,” has an affirmative obligation to warn customers the soup contains monosodium glutamate (MSG). Plaintiff, David Livingston, alleges he suffered a severe adverse reaction after consuming a bowl of Marie Callenders’s vegetable soup. It is undisputed the soup contained MSG. Had plaintiff known the soup contained MSG, he would not have eaten it. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s strict liability claim on the ground, as…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Livingston v. Marie Callender's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999