Legal Opinion

In Re the Reinstatement of Chantry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1974No. C.D. 3697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

— For violations of Canons of Professional Ethics 11 and 29, and Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 1A (as adopted November 2, 1960), RCW vol. 0, Arthur S. W. Chantry was disbarred on October 28, 1965. In re Chantry, 67 Wn.2d 190, 407 P.2d 160 (1965). The details of the violations are set forth in that opinion and need not be repeated here.

Mr. Chantry’s application for reinstatement is before us for consideration, accompanied by a recommendation of the Board of Governors that his application be granted.. The board, after hearing the petitioner’s testimony and after considering the supporting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re EddlemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against ChantryWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WalgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. McKinnon v. Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MoynihanWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WalgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API