Legal Opinion
Pedroza v. BRB
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2010No. 05-75449PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge COLLINS; Special Concurrence by Judge PREGERSON.
ORDER
The opinion filed on October 1, 2009, and reported at 583 F.3d 1139 is hereby amended. An amended opinion and special concurrence are filed concurrently with this order.
The panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Pregerson and Judge Smith have voted to deny the petition, and Judge Collins has so recommended.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- U. S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert Thomas v. Calportland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Claiborne v. BlauserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Warren Iopa v. Saltchuk-Young Brothers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Dennis Claiborne v. BlauserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.