Legal Opinion

Robert Thomas v. Calportland Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2021No. 20-70541PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT THOMAS, No. 20-70541 Petitioner, MSHR No. v. WEST 2018- 402-DM CALPORTLAND COMPANY; FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, OPINION Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Argued and Submitted December 10, 2020 Seattle, Washington Filed April 14, 2021 Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Danielle J. Hunsaker, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Hunsaker 2 THOMAS V. CALPORTLAND SUMMARY * Mine Safety and Health Act The panel granted a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Continental Cement Company v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  2. (SS) Adams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (SS) Alvarez Marin v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (SS) Alvarez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. (SS) Anthony T. Marrufo v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API