Legal Opinion
Claiborne v. Blauser
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 2019No. 16-16077PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion filed in this case on June 28, 2019 is amended by replacing the text of footnote 7 on page 28, Claiborne v. Blauser , 928 F.3d 794, 810 n.7 (9th Cir. 2019), with the following paragraphs:
Because we remand for a new trial on the shackling claim, we do not address the merits of Claiborne's evidentiary arguments that the district court erred in barring his testimony about the ADA, preventing him from introducing or testifying about his medical records, and denying his request for a medical expert. The district court may revisit these issues if Claiborne raises them again at the new…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- MacKenzie Brown v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- City & County of San Francisco v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Kami Etemadi v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Chanel WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- (PC) Asberry v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.