Legal Opinion

BECKER Et Al. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1981No. A-918PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.

Applicants claimed depreciation, investment credits, and other expenses on their federal income tax returns with respect to certain videotapes. The Internal Revenue Service issued summonses directing the production of the videotapes and, on the appointed date, applicants appeared before the IRS agent with the videotapes. They agreed to permit the agent to examine, play, and otherwise inspect the videotapes for as long as desired, but only in their presence, and declined to leave the videotapes in the possession of the agent. Not satisfied with such an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Cardenas, A/K/A Raul RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hank WestphalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Fall River Foundry Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. CurlOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API