Legal Opinion
Frommert v. Conkright
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 5, 2009No. 00-CV-6311LPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
On January 6, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the defendants in this case, the Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan and its administrators (hereinafter “defendants” or “the Plan”), violated plaintiffs’ rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The Court of Appeals held that the Plan impermissibly calculated plaintiffs’ benefits by using a so-called “phantom account.” 433 F.3d 254. Familiarity with the Second Circuit’s decision on this…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- WILLIAM A. GRAHAM CO. v. HaugheyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Kunsman v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
- Millennium Pipeline Co. v. Certain Permanent & Temporary Easements in (No Number) Thayer Road, S.B.L. No. 63.00-1-24.1District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Nation v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Allied Transit Corp. v. Local 854 Pension FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.