State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. Curl
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The State Fire Marshal asserts that he is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in prohibition and mandamus. If a lower court patently and unambiguously lacks jurisdiction to proceed in a cause, prohibition and mandamus will issue to prevent any future unauthorized exercise of jurisdiction and to correct the results of prior jurisdictionally unauthorized actions. See *570State ex rel. Dannaher v. Crawford (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 391, 393, 678 N.E.2d 549, 552.
Once an appeal is taken, the trial court is divested of jurisdiction except “over issues not inconsistent with that of the appellate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Ralph Lightfoot, Lacarttle Jones, Fred Jenkins, and Nelson Weaver v. Daniel Walker, Governor of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- State ex rel. Watkins v. Eighth District Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Geauga County Board of Commissioners v. MilliganOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. CurlOhio Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.